Is LEAN the most fucked-up thing to happen to the U.S. Navy sailor since they took away our grog, or is it just me? I studiously avoided attending their indoctrination classes for years, but today fate caught up with me. There's four hours I'd rather have been scrubbing shitters.
For some reason it took four instructors to teach the class, and all four were continuously in the room. They had one of 'em just hitting the "enter" button on the laptop to advance the PowerPoint presentation, while another did the talking. Here's LEAN suggestion number one: buy a freaking wireless mouse and join the twenty first century, you masters of efficiency! Actually, as it turns out, all four of them are trained to pounce on (and stifle) any criticism as a team. Maybe that's why they give them combative titles like "green belt".
The training starts out with a completely BS "exercise" designed to be as inefficient as possible. Even if everyone in the class can recognize how screwed up it is right off the bat, the LEAN people still make you act it out, wasting about an hour of everyone's time. How else can they demonstrate the superiority of THEIR god if they don't show you how much you need their help?
After Contrived Exercise #1, they allow your class to discuss ways of improving performance, while they sit back and smirk at your feeble attempts. They've run this drill a million times, so they know all sorts of tricks you couldn't think up in the short amount of time they give you to do so. But, to stack the deck even further, they leave out some information as well. In our case, they just flat out lied to us about what our objectives were.
We run the exercise again, and dramatically improve efficiency (by their standards, anyway). Even so, what follows is a Bataan Deathmarch of a presentation, which is a mix of common-sense crap that's been around forever (like the idea of drawing outlines of all the tools hanging on a pegboard, which is something my Grandpa did) with a sprinkle of self-congratulatory masturbation that makes you think you're really at a Scientology recruitment seminar.
Finally, we run the exercise again, only this time "their way". This time through, they tell you all sorts of stuff they forgot to mention the first two times, like how many products you're actually supposed to be making. They also dramatically reduce the "acceptance criteria" for said product, thus virtually assuring "their way" is the most efficient. (Oddly enough, their own calculation showed that we had improved the efficiency almost twice as much BEFORE the training as they did with their techniques after it. I pointed this out, to the amusement of my team).
While we were instructed to remain "open minded" to new ideas at the start of the class, none of the folks teaching it were leading by example. At the start of the third exercise, I had this lively conversation with one of the teachers:
Her, to me: "Would you like to be the Water Spider" [The person running around handing out supplies]
Me: "No."
Her: "Why don't you want to be the Water Spider?"
Me: "Since we know this time around how many we're making, why don't we just hand out enough supplies beforehand?"
Her, firmly: "The question I asked was 'Do you want to be the Water Spider?' ".
Me: "No."
Which was pretty much how the whole class went. If they detected even a little criticism, all four of the bastards would gang up on you until you shut up (and it took all four to shut ME up). They most definitely did not like me pointing out the obvious flaws in their proof-of-concept exercise, and that nothing in the training between the second and the third exercise would lead you to make all the improvements they made. It was just advertising, pure and simple.
You know, Admiral Rickover hated management systems, and frequently said so. I'm not actually as close-minded, but I've yet to see a management system that applied to something other than an assembly line... and if you need a management system to figure out how to make widgets a little faster, you're a retard and no management system will save you. They have yet to show me how LEAN has anything to do with being a nuc, and became downright hostile today when I asked for that very information.
I subscribe to Admiral Rickover's management system: Work hard, do your fucking job as a chief (or first or whatever), and you'll figure out all on your own how to improve. It isn't rocket science, or even nuclear physics.
16 comments:
It was a necessity for many positions at Owens Corning. Occasionally someone notices something that can be improved, but it mostly makework and opportunities for someone pushing an agenda to squash disagreement from those w/o green or black belts. Hell, the concepts are simple and not a secret.
-3383
We are going LEAN at my company as well. The funny thing is most of us technicians on the floor actually doing the work have been doing most of this stuff for years, but getting flack from above.
Now those from above are suddenly "On the Bandwagon" and pushing this stuff like it's brand new. A lot of us know more of the basics and behind the scenes concepts from actual experience than the instructors!
Everyone in our group needs to be yellow belt certified, so I had to take the two day course as part of my orientation. We shot ping pong balls. We're an engineering code, not an assembly line. There was no relevance, and I'll never get those two days back.
Is LEAN what they are calling "Total Quality Leadership/Management, nowadays?
Crap then. Crap now.
No, but they are remarkably similar. TQL had you do a contrived exercise with black and white marbles, LEAN does pretty much the same thing, only with colored stickers. And, just think - right now there's an admiral deep in the bowels of the pentagon getting blown by the sales rep from some NEW management fad the rest of us don't even know exists yet. Rickover's probably spinning in his grave so fast he's ready for electrical loading.
Wow, you described the LEAN I recieved as a civilian to a tee. During the third exercise, half of us decided to die during the production period to "demonstrate" the obvious flaws in the contrived system.
LEAN is crap. When my Boeing SPA shows up and asks what we're doing LEAN wise my standard answer is not a damn thing. Boeing, Cessna and the rest use us as a warehouse for parts. They call, we send. They want instant response on parts that take days to make - not to mention the 90 day lead time on material.
Funny comments. A couple of weeks ago we had a dozen of these types follow around operators and maintenance guys at the nuke plant where I work to "identify areas of efficiency improvement." Keep in mind that not a single one of these individuals knew a damn thing about how to make electricity, much less nuclear power and teh NRC.
Funny, I just started reading 'The Rickover Effect' today. Chapter one has this quote:
What it takes to do a job will not be learned from management courses....Human experience shows that people, not organizations or management systems get things done. HGR
It's amazing how much the nuclear Navy has gotten away from this.
TQL, TQM, Six Sigma, EVM, LEAN. All the same animal in different skins and, IMHO, all good in their own place.
Submarines had a lock on this early on. It’s called laziness. The lazy sailor will find a better, more efficient way of doing things. Anything to make the job easier while getting to the desired goal. We expected it. When a new Aganger came onboard, he was expected to find an easer way to fix something. He was expected to say “Chief, how about if we do it this way, I think I could save some time.” If the Chief was worth his salt, he would let it happen. If it failed, the sailor learned a valuable lesson. If it succeeded, both the Chief and the sailor learned something they could pass down. If the Chief was worth his salt, he would make sure the sailor got recognition for the idea.
When I was on the McKee in the early 90’s, we were the TQL Flagship. While process improvement can work in civilian life, there are few places in the Navy for it. When the water is knee deep, it is not time to put a PAT together and figure out a better way to stop the flooding and if you tried to do it before the flooding, it was pushed off as a waiste of time. However, in the shops, many processes were improved by TQL because the management was willing to look at it. The blue shirts knew what to do to make things better. Deming knew that and so did the Japanese.
That Damn Good Looking Aganger From Iowa
While I have not had the (mis)fortune of attending any LEAN training, I have spent many hours the same type of training while on active duty and in human performance improvement type training since I hired on in the commercial industry. As a Navy instructor and then as a SSN RCLCPO, I did find most of it to fall somewhere between tedious and insulting, at the outset. On reflection though, I see something different. While from FTN’s perspective, it was 4 hours of his life that he will never get back, perhaps a more positive outlook is that it was 4 hours that he wasn’t in and ICU or morgue. Only late in my Navy Career did I come to this conclusion and in my civilian job, it’s like this: I get paid to sit and listen politely, and they get paid to say whatever the company wants them to say. I’m happy (paid), their happy (paid) and the company is happy (whatever). And hey FTN, are you honestly telling me that you didn’t enjoy flipping them $hit, just a little. Have a Navy day….
Good grief!!!
Thanks for yet another reminder of why I retired.
Some years back when I was an EMC, we had a little problem that requires us to be in Puget Sound for almost three months. We went into shift work for about six straight weeks setting plant conditions. We then had two week days to roll into 3 section duty. The nuke CPOs had worked out a plan to get our guys three days off during this time. On the first day out of shift work, the CO schedule us for TQL training. The CPOs and above had one type, the blue shirts another. We cryed foul, but to no avail.
We rolled back into shift work a couple of weeks later and returned to Pearl 12/22. We had some more half day training sessions with the plan to go totally TQL. We started two pilot pojects. One was to fix our time management problems (i.e. too much crap in the plan of the week). The other was to improve SS quals (The CO decided that his spot checks of guys passing their boards revealed too many holes). I was in charge of the SS quals team and the 3MC was in charge of the time management team. After several weeks of meetings where we couldn't easily get the whole team together, we decided to can-x the time management team because there wasn't enough time for all the meetings. We fixed the qual thing by getting the CO to agree to quit treating the CO signature after the board as quality check. It surprised us because we basically told him, "You qualified the officer that said this guy passed, so why are you second-guessing him?" We in turn made sure that the right QPOs were signing qual cards.
I haven't had to endure this. . . stuff yet, but here is my take after observing the institutional resistance we have to changes/good ideas. Lean gives an administrative process that allows DH and up to see that all of the "i"s are dotted and Ts crossed on a good idea that you wanted to implement, or for the DH that isn't worth his salt it gives a way to prove to them that something is worth doing.
Forget Lean, just 5S the damn submarine and have the Chief's teach, teach and then teach some more.
You'll have the best boat in the fleet.
What are the Five S's?
Sort - the first step in making things cleaned up and organized
Set In Order - organize, identify and arrange everything in a work area
Shine - regular cleaning and maintenance
Standardize - make it easy to maintain - simplify and standardize
Sustain -maintaining what has been accomplished
Post a Comment